Vogel et al. (2017). A Qualitative Study of Quality of Life Concerns following a Melanoma Diagnosis

Question

Vogel et al. (2017). A Qualitative Study of Quality of Life Concerns Following a Melanoma Diagnosis.
///Journal of Skin Cancer. Volume 2017, Article ID 2041872, https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/2041872
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oInRwt6kepo&feature=emb_logo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sFYgvNxVl40&feature=emb_logo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mq98MLxhniw&feature=emb_logo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L_eSRR3qNU8&feature=emb_logo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=1&v=VyQFXtJ5opo&feature=emb_logo
Watch and read all of these please !!
There should be only two sources
Vogel et al. (2017). A Qualitative Study of Quality of Life Concerns following a Melanoma Diagnosis. Journal of Skin Cancer, vol. 217, pps. 1-8
Lincoln, Y. S. & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Paper # 1

Vogel et al. (2017). A Qualitative Study of Quality of Life Concerns following a Melanoma Diagnosis.
Journal of Skin Cancer, vol. 217, pps. 1-8
Instructions: Answer all questions using Question and Answer format and APA style.

Who conducted/assisted the current study?

What is (are) the source(s) of study funding, if any?

What is the motivating research question? (Please state in your own words the question even if it is not stated by the authors)

Is the research qualitative or quantitative in nature?

Is the research exploratory, descriptive, or explanatory in nature? (For help on this matter go to https://www.snapsurveys.com/blog/benefit-3-types-survey-research/)

What type(s) of sample is employed in the study? Briefly, describe the sample. What is the recruitment strategy?

How were data collected? Please provide a descriptive summary.

How were the ethical concerns dealt with in the current study?

What are the results? Hint, what are the recurrent themes?

Please discuss the issues relating to trustworthiness of the study as per Lincoln and Guba (1985). Note, Vogel et al. (2017) did not employ trustworthiness.

What are possible limitations or problems of the study? Hint, see page 6.

What are possible strengths of the study? Hint, see page 6.


Reference

Lincoln, Y. S. & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Failure to follow APA format will trigger a 20 point penalty!

All answers must be full English sentences and all quotes must be compliant with APA citation rules.

Instructions: Answer all questions using Question and Answer format.

Vogel et al. (2017). A Qualitative Study of Quality of Life Concerns following a Melanoma Diagnosis. Journal of Skin Cancer, vol. 217, pps. 1-8
Below is an example of the Question/Answer format that I require for the papers. Please make sure your answers are in the below format and compliant with APA citation rules: apastyle_spring_2012 _1_.pdf


PLEASE NOTE THAT PAPERS REFER TO ARTICLE REVIEWS.

Example Paper -- Doob and Gross (1968)

1. Who conducted/assisted the current study?

A. N. Doob and A. E. Gross conducted the study. Tina Fox and Mike Rosenberg acted as field observers and Professor Lorraine Soderstrum of Foothill College assisted by making her class of introductory psychology students available as subjects for the classroom questionnaire experiment (Doob and Gross, 1968).

2. What is (are) the source(s) of study funding, if any?

The immediate source of the study funding was not mentioned. However, it was indicated that A.N. Doob was supported by a “Public Health Service Predoctoral Fellowship” (Doob and Gross, 1968, p.213).
....

Reference

Doob, A. N. and Gross, A. E. (1968). Status of frustrator as an inhibitor of horn honking response. The Journal of Social Psychology, 76, 213-218.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VyQFXtJ5opo